Current:Home > MyFDA moves to ease restrictions on blood donations for men who have sex with men -FundGuru
FDA moves to ease restrictions on blood donations for men who have sex with men
View
Date:2025-04-14 04:45:53
Updated 12:55 p.m. ET
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued proposed guidance Friday to ease restrictions on blood donations by men who have sex with men.
The change is expected to take effect after a public comment period.
The restrictions on donating blood date back to the early days of the AIDS epidemic and were designed to protect the blood supply from HIV. Originally, gay and bisexual men were completely prohibited from donating blood. Over time, the FDA relaxed the lifetime ban, but still kept in place some limits.
Under the current policy — last updated in 2020 — men who have sex with men can donate blood if they haven't had sexual contact with other men for three months.
The new proposed policy would eliminate the time-based restrictions on men who have sex with men (and their female partners) and instead screen potential donors' eligibility based on a series of questions that assess their HIV risk, regardless of gender. Anyone taking medications to treat or prevent HIV, including PrEP, would not be eligible.
The risk assessment would include questions about anal sex. Potential donors who've had anal sex in the last three months with a new sexual partner or more than one sexual partner would not be eligible to give blood.
The changes are aimed at addressing criticism that the current policy is discriminatory and outdated, as well as one more barrier to bolstering the nation's blood supply. Blood banks already routinely screen donated blood for HIV.
"We are moving now to an inclusive policy for blood donation," said Dr. Peter Marks, who leads the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research at the FDA during a briefing Friday.
"We will continue to work to make sure that we have policies that allow everyone who wants to donate blood to be able to donate blood within what the science allows to make sure that the blood supply remains safe."
In crafting the new guidance, the FDA has been looking to the results of a study of about 1,600 gay and bisexual men to develop screening questions that can identify potential donors who are most likely to be infected with HIV.
Reaction to the news from advocates, medical groups and blood banks has been positive.
"The blood community is very excited about the proposed changes," says Kate Fry, CEO of America's Blood Centers. "We have advocated for a decade now for a move to an individual risk assessment model. So this is very welcome by blood centers across the country."
She stressed that all donated blood is carefully screened for HIV and that testing has improved dramatically to ensure the safety of the blood supply.
For many years, the American Medical Association, the American Red Cross and LGBTQ+ advocacy groups have pushed for a change to the federal rules on blood donations.
"These changes are 40-plus years in the making and they're a tremendous leap forward in elevating science over stigma," says Tony Morrison, a spokesperson for the advocacy group GLAAD.
But GLAAD and other groups say the changes still don't go far enough. They argue that some of the remaining restrictions are still unnecessary and stigmatizing, such as the prohibition against donations by people taking medication PrEP to prevent HIV.
"When we limit and defer people who are being proactive in their sexual health that stigmatizes them. The misconception is that people on PrEP are promiscuous or have a higher risk of HIV infection — that's categorically false," says Morrison.
So his group will continue to lobby the FDA to further ease restrictions.
The proposed changes in the blood donation rules will be open for public comment for 60 days. The FDA will then review those comments and issue a final rule, probably later this year. So monogamous gay men could start donating blood again sometime in 2023.
veryGood! (5)
Related
- Trump suggestion that Egypt, Jordan absorb Palestinians from Gaza draws rejections, confusion
- The Talk to sign off for good in December after 15 seasons
- Bill meant to improve math skills passes as Kentucky lawmakers approach end of legislative session
- Trump Media stock price plummets Monday as company files to issue millions of shares
- The FBI should have done more to collect intelligence before the Capitol riot, watchdog finds
- Outrage after Texas retiree hit with $10,000 in cosmetics charges after visit to mall kiosk
- Henry Cavill Expecting First Baby With Girlfriend Natalie Viscuso
- Jamie Lynn Spears' Daughter Maddie Is All Grown Up in Prom Photos
- From family road trips to travel woes: Americans are navigating skyrocketing holiday costs
- Is whole milk good for you? Here are the healthiest milk options, according to an expert
Ranking
- California DMV apologizes for license plate that some say mocks Oct. 7 attack on Israel
- Ciara Reveals Why She Wants to Lose 70 Pounds of Her Post-Baby Weight
- Cold case: 1968 slaying of Florida milkman, WWII vet solved after suspect ID’d, authorities say
- Ex-youth center worker testifies that top bosses would never take kids’ word over staff
- Paige Bueckers vs. Hannah Hidalgo highlights women's basketball games to watch
- In war saga ‘The Sympathizer,’ Vietnamese voices are no longer stuck in the background
- Love Is Blind's Chelsea Responds After Megan Fox Defends Her Against Criticism
- Large dust devil captured by storm chaser as it passes through Route 66 in Arizona: Watch
Recommendation
Macy's says employee who allegedly hid $150 million in expenses had no major 'impact'
What's the purpose of a W-4 form? Here's what it does and how it can help you come Tax Day
Former All-Star, World Series champion pitcher Ken Holtzman dies
John Sterling, Yankees' legendary broadcaster, has decided to call it a career
Apple iOS 18.2: What to know about top features, including Genmoji, AI updates
Wealth Forge Institute: WFI TOKEN GIVES AI PROFIT PRO THE WINGS OF A DREAM
Trump trial: Why can’t Americans see or hear what is going on inside the courtroom?
He didn't want her to have the baby. So he poisoned their newborn's bottle with antifreeze.